Opis bibliograficzny

Risk factors for the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes aph(3′)-III, erm(B), sul2 and tet(W) in pig and broiler faeces in nine European countries. [AUT.] YANG DONGSHENG, HEEDERIK DICK J. J., MEVIUS DIK J., SCHERPENISSE PETER, LUIKEN ROOSMARIJN E. C., VAN GOMPEL LIESE, WADEPOHL KATHARINA, CHAUVIN CLAIRE, VAN HEIJNSBERGEN ERI, WOUTERS INGE M., GREVE GERDIT D., JONGERIUS-GORTEMAKER BETTY G. M., TERSTEEG-ZIJDERVELD MONIQUE, WASYL DARIUSZ, JURASCHEK KATHARINA, FISCHER JENNIE, WAGENAAR JAAP A., SMIT LIDWIEN A. M., SCHMITT HEIKE, SKARŻYŃSKA MAGDALENA, ZAJĄC MAGDALENA. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac002
Skopiowane!
Kliknij opis aby skopiować do schowka

Szczegóły publikacji

Rok:2022
Język:angielski
Charakter formalny:Artykuł w czasopismie
Typ MNiSW/MEiN:inne

Streszczenia

Objectives The occurrence and zoonotic potential of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pigs and broilers has been studied intensively in past decades. Here, we describe AMR levels of European pig and broiler farms and determine the potential risk factors. Methods We collected faeces from 181 pig farms and 181 broiler farms in nine European countries. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to quantify the relative abundance of four antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) [aph(3′)-III, erm(B), sul2 and tet(W)] in these faeces samples. Information on antimicrobial use (AMU) and other farm characteristics was collected through a questionnaire. A mixed model using country and farm as random effects was performed to evaluate the relationship of AMR with AMU and other farm characteristics. The correlation between individual qPCR data and previously published pooled metagenomic data was evaluated. Variance component analysis was conducted to assess the variance contribution of all factors. Results The highest abundance of ARG was for tet(W) in pig faeces and erm(B) in broiler faeces. In addition to the significant positive association between corresponding ARG and AMU levels, we also found on-farm biosecurity measures were associated with relative ARG abundance in both pigs and broilers. Between-country and between-farm variation can partially be explained by AMU. Different ARG targets may have different sample size requirements to represent the overall farm level precisely. Conclusions qPCR is an efficient tool for targeted assessment of AMR in livestock-related samples. The AMR variation between samples was mainly contributed to by between-country, between-farm and within-farm differences, and then by on-farm AMU.

Identyfikatory

ISSN: 0305-7453
e-ISSN: 1460-2091
BPP ID: (7, 8867) wydawnictwo ciągłe #8867

Metryki

140,00
Punkty MNiSW/MEiN
0
Impact Factor
0
Index Copernicus
0
Punktacja wewnętrzna

Eksport cytowania

Wsparcie dla menedżerów bibliografii:
Ta strona wspiera automatyczny import do Zotero, Mendeley i EndNote. Użytkownicy z zainstalowanym rozszerzeniem przeglądarki mogą zapisać tę publikację jednym kliknięciem - ikona pojawi się automatycznie w pasku narzędzi przeglądarki.

Skopiowane!

Informacje dodatkowe

Status:przed korektą
Praca recenzowana:nie
Rekord utworzony:2 kwietnia 2025 01:21
Ostatnia aktualizacja:4 czerwca 2025 13:40